Skip to main content
All CollectionsStudy types & research methods
Randomized Control Trial (RCT)
Randomized Control Trial (RCT)
Allison Elechko avatar
Written by Allison Elechko
Updated over a week ago

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a type of scientific experiment where participants are randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. It is considered the gold standard for research design due to its ability to minimize bias and provide reliable evidence.

What is a RCT?

An RCT is a study that tests how effective a treatment or intervention is by randomly dividing participants into groups. One group (the control) gets standard care or a placebo, while the other (the experimental group) receives the treatment being studied. Randomization makes the groups similar, reducing bias and improving reliability. Blinding, where participants and/or researchers don’t know which group is which, further reduces bias. RCTs are commonly used in medicine and public health to understand cause-effect relationships and support evidence-based decisions.

Advantages of RCT

Minimizes bias: Randomization and blinding reduce selection and performance bias, making results more reliable.

High-quality evidence: RCTs are considered the most robust method for determining the efficacy of interventions.

Limitations of RCT

Resource-intensive: Conducting RCTs requires significant time, funding, and expertise.

Limited generalizability: Results may not always apply to broader populations due to the specific participant pool.


The Hierarchy of Evidence

How does RCT fit in with other types of evidence? Read more about the hierarchy of evidence here.


Key Components of RCT

Random Allocation: Participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group, which helps eliminate selection bias and ensures that the groups are comparable.

Controlled Conditions: The study is conducted under controlled conditions to minimize the influence of external variables.

Prospective Design: RCTs are forward-looking, meaning they follow participants over time to observe the effects of the intervention.

Comparative Nature: The outcomes of the intervention group are compared to those of the control group to determine the effectiveness of the intervention.

Steps in Conducting a RCT

  1. Planning and Design: Researchers start by figuring out the main question they want to answer and the goals of the study. They choose the right study design (like comparing two groups or switching treatments) and make sure they get approval from an ethics board to ensure everything is fair and safe.

  2. Recruitment and Randomization: Participants are chosen based on set rules about who can or can’t join the study. They are then randomly assigned to groups (like one getting the treatment and one not), and sometimes neither the participants nor the researchers know who is in which group to keep things unbiased.

  3. Intervention Implementation: The treatment or procedure is given to participants in the same way for everyone, with staff following clear instructions. Researchers also make sure participants stick to the plan as much as possible.

  4. Data Collection and Monitoring: Researchers decide what results to measure and use reliable tools to collect that data. They keep the data safe and organized and sometimes check the progress during the study to make sure everything is on track.

  5. Data Analysis: Researchers create a plan to analyze the data, figuring out how to handle missing information and ensure fair comparisons. They also calculate how many participants they need to make sure the results are meaningful.

  6. Reporting and Dissemination: The results of the study, whether positive or not, are shared honestly following specific guidelines. Researchers publish the findings in scientific journals and share them with the community to help others learn from the study.

Did this answer your question?